Stillness in time at Idsworth

Photography is very often a solitary pursuit and when outdoors in a beautiful landscape I find it is one of contemplation as well. Time passes swiftly as I immerse myself in the surroundings with just the occasional person walking past who may or may not say hello. That’s fine by me. I don’t wish to sound unsociable but nor do I want my concentration broken.

This weekend I decided to slow things right down and do some long exposure captures. It’s not an approach I have taken before for one principal reason. I have always thought myself to be a spontaneous, albeit considered photographer, who enjoys hand held compositions. The flexibility of being able to move a camera quickly from one position to another is in stark contrast to the tedium of carrying and using a tripod. However long exposures and tripods go hand hand in hand assuming of course you want the static element in the frame to be sharp. If you enjoy ICM (Intentional Camera Movement) then a tripod is no longer a requirement.

With clouds in the sky for the first time in many weeks and a gusty summer wind the conditions were ideal for what I had in mind. In truth I also wanted to try out my latest acquistion – a Gitzo tripod and ball head. My old tripod would not have been sufficiently sturdy in the wind so I was keen to find out how the new set-up performed. Perfectly was the answer. Very sturdy and a joy to use. What more could I ask?

I knew the location I wanted to visit. The church of St Hubert at Idsworth in Hampshire. The church is elevated and surrounded by fields. On arrival I was pleased to see the long grasses in front of the church. The cloud formations were also just right. Things were coming together nicely. Far from being an expert in this style of photography I experimented with shutter times to see what worked best. The header image was 15 seconds whilst the image below was 30 seconds which further amplified the degree of movement in the sky. Perhaps the cloud movement is a little too exaggerated below, but that’s down to presonal preference. I have yet to decide which I prefer.

After a while I moved further away and took the shot below looking back at church on the horizon. I used the wide grass path and corn fields on either side as a lead in line. All the pictures were captured with an Zeiss 18mm lens and Lee Big Stopper.

At the end of the session I was a little surprised how much I enjoyed the experience of taking these long exposures. I took my time finding the right position for my chosen composition. Further time was taken setting up the camera and tripod. I then had to wait as the exposure time came down and was then repeated by the built in Noise Reduction. A 30 second exposure took in fact a full minute before the result appeared on the camera screen. On a number of ocassions the result was either over or underexposed as the passing clouds would cast shadows on the scene affecting the optimum exposure time. Sometimes the wind would drop and impact on the amount of movement in the grasses or the final placement of the clouds did not result in a pleasing composition. Far from being tiresome I actually enjoyed the unpredictability of the results, but more than that, I found the whole approach forced me to slow down. I had no choice and consequently it provided me with a more immersive and contemplative experience than might normally be the case. One, I will definitely be repeating.

Other posts featuring Idsworth Church can be found by clicking on the links below.

Churches Project No.21 – Idsworth, a church in a field

Idsworth Church – the return visit

14 Responses to “Stillness in time at Idsworth”

  1. 35:Chronicle

    I prefer the drama in the 30″ exposure by far. A simple and engaging composition. Lovely post.

    Like

    Reply
    • alan frost

      Thanks very much for your comment. I agree there is more drama to the longer exposure, I also like the square crop, so overall it’s likely to be my favourite. I will be interested if others express a preference. Thanks again.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
  2. 35:Chronicle

    I agree with you on the square format. Isolates the composition very well indeed. Makes me want to go out and try it for myself. Fab stuff, Alan. All the best, Robert.

    Like

    Reply
  3. marcelo leonard

    Beautiful series. I admire your mastery in B&W conversion.

    You said: ” I found the whole approach forced me to slow down. “ and I believe that it is the key that makes a photographic session enjoyable.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    • alan frost

      Thats very kind of you to say so. Much appreciated. I couldn’t agree more with what you have said. The more immersive the session the better the experience. I might be using a tripod more often in the future!

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
  4. Robert Parker

    I love seeing thirty seconds of time represented in the cloud travel, while the church remains still, in perfect focus, for thirty seconds, or I guess, a millenium or so. These are wonderful pictures.

    Like

    Reply
    • alan frost

      Thanks Robert. The picture was intended to evoke a feeling about the passage of time and the stillness of an ancient church and what that represents. It pleases me to know that your own interpretion is much the same. Thanks again for your kind comment.

      Like

      Reply
  5. LensScaper

    Slowing down – me too. I haven’t yet started to use a Tripod, and I doubt I ever will. But I have discovered the pleasure of simply slowing down and taking time to really work a scene or a wood. A tripod for me is still anathema because it restricts the ability to move about freely. But…for long exposures a tripod is a must and these images are the proof. I prefer the 30 second one, I think I might even have tried a full minute, but I guess that, depending on the filter used, there may be limits. Square frame works very well – it’s a format I am using more and more. Nice work, Alan

    Like

    Reply
    • alan frost

      I too have largely resisted using a tripod but having a desire to do some long exposures – mainly landscapes – I had no option. I found it more challenging getting the composition just as I wanted it, but as you rightly say I couldn’t have made this picture without one. A necessary evil one might say. The 30sec exposure is my preferred choice and I will try longer exposures in future to compare the results. I do like the unpredictability. Thanks as always Andy. PS just seen your latest post and yes – can we have normal back please!!

      Like

      Reply
    • alan frost

      Thanks Diana. I’m very pleased with the tripod but it will only be used when absolutely necessary. I have never been a fan in the past but on ocassions they are essential.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.